3:37 pm · 20 October 2026

SpaceX must show that Starlink can fund the Group’s growing ambitions

SpaceX is entering another earnings season facing a challenge it did not have to address so directly just a few years ago. Elon Musk can still talk about Mars, an artificial intelligence revolution, and the construction of infrastructure that could transform entire industries. But since going public, these ambitions have come with a tangible price tag, and investors want to know what they are getting in return for the billions being spent.

In the private markets, it was easier to assign value to the future. Belief in the founder’s vision, technological breakthroughs, and the potential to capture new markets was often enough. A publicly traded company has far less leeway to postpone questions about profitability. Revenue growth matters, but what matters even more is how much capital it takes to achieve that growth and whether the business can eventually stand on its own two feet.

Starlink remains SpaceX’s financial backbone, but its profits are becoming increasingly difficult to view as sufficient support for the entire group. The connectivity business generates cash, while space operations and AI consume enormous amounts of capital, with no certainty that they will achieve sustainable profitability. The larger these investments become, the greater the pressure on Starlink to do more than maintain growth: it must also fund increasingly expensive projects. In its third-quarter results, investors will therefore be looking for an answer to a key question: can SpaceX develop new businesses without continually increasing the burden on its only clearly profitable pillar?

Key Expectations

  • Third-quarter revenue: approximately $12.7 billion.

  • Total operating profit: approximately $200 million.

  • Connectivity segment, including Starlink and connectivity services: $4.45 billion in revenue and $1.66 billion in operating profit.

  • AI segment: $7.3 billion in revenue and an operating loss of $938 million.

  • Space segment: an expected operating loss of $525 million.

  • Launch activity: approximately 35 launches during the quarter, including 10 customer missions.

Full-year 2026 forecast: Connectivity is expected to generate $17.4 billion in revenue and $6.5 billion in operating profit. The Space segment is projected to deliver $3.4 billion in revenue while posting a $2.3 billion operating loss. Meanwhile, AI could generate $27.1 billion in revenue and an operating loss of $1.5 billion.

Starlink Is Profitable, but the Entire Group Remains Dependent on It

Starlink is now SpaceX’s financial backbone. Forecast quarterly revenue of $4.45 billion and operating profit of $1.66 billion demonstrate that connectivity services have a very different economic profile from rocket development or AI infrastructure. This is a business that can grow alongside its subscriber base, expanded coverage, and acquisition of corporate and public-sector customers. It is here that the link between increased scale and improved financial performance is most tangible.

That does not mean SpaceX, as a whole, is in a comfortable position. Starlink’s profitability does not eliminate the costs of the group’s other ventures; it simply helps finance them. With the Connectivity segment projected to generate $6.5 billion in operating profit in 2026, it is expected to deliver a substantial surplus. At the same time, the Space segment could record an operating loss of $2.3 billion, with the AI segment adding another $1.5 billion in losses. Under this scenario, the group’s overall performance will depend not only on how quickly Starlink grows but also on how much capital Musk’s other ambitions consume.

Scalability Means More Than Rising Revenue

The key question is whether SpaceX can increase revenue faster than costs. A scalable business should eventually generate more profit from each additional unit sold without having to increase spending proportionally. For Starlink, this path could be driven by a growing user base, more efficient use of existing infrastructure, and the expansion of services for businesses and governments. Each additional customer could improve the economics of the business, although maintaining a competitive advantage will require further investment in satellites, terminals, and network capacity.

The situation is more challenging in the AI segment. Forecast revenue of $27.1 billion for the full year 2026 looks impressive, but an operating loss of $1.5 billion is a reminder that high sales do not necessarily translate into a profitable business model. Spending on computing power, data centers, and model development could rise just as quickly as demand. Investors will therefore want to understand whether current expenditure is laying the groundwork for future margin improvements or whether every new phase of growth will require another round of massive spending.

Scalability looks different again in the space business. A higher number of launches could improve infrastructure utilization and reduce unit costs, but Starship development requires investment before commercial benefits can emerge at a meaningful scale. Forecast launches of 147 for the whole of 2026, including 37 customer missions, will not automatically make the segment profitable. What matters is the composition of those missions, the revenue generated by each launch, and how quickly new technological capabilities begin to deliver recurring income.

Starship and AI Expand the Potential but Add to the Financial Burden

The Space segment is expected to post an operating loss of $525 million in the third quarter. For the full year, that loss could reach $2.3 billion despite revenue of $3.4 billion. This reflects the cost of developing technologies that could open up new markets in the future but do not yet offer sufficiently attractive economics. The number of launches alone will not justify such spending. SpaceX will need to demonstrate tangible progress in deploying Starship and establish a credible path toward operations capable of financing a larger share of their own development.

Similar tensions are evident in AI. Revenue could grow rapidly, but as long as the segment remains unprofitable, its expansion will increase the group’s overall need for capital. For SpaceX, this means maintaining a balance between long-term investments with extended payback periods and a business that already generates profits today. Starlink provides the group with financial support, but it is not an inexhaustible source of funding. The greater the spending on AI and space technologies, the more important it will become for these ventures to improve their own financial performance.

Speculation About a Tesla Merger Is a Separate Issue

Speculation about a possible merger between SpaceX and Tesla is also attracting attention. Both companies are developing technologies related to artificial intelligence, and Elon Musk leads both organizations. Such a transaction could change how individual ventures are financed and valued, but there is currently no official confirmation that it will happen. It should therefore not be treated as part of SpaceX’s base-case financial outlook.

If the idea returns in a more concrete form, the key issues will be the terms of the transaction, the allocation of control, and how the combined structure would distribute the costs of capital-intensive projects. Technological synergies alone do not guarantee benefits for investors. Combining two companies with different revenue sources and investment requirements could increase their financing capacity, but it could just as easily make it harder to assess the profitability of individual businesses.

The Quality of Growth Will Matter Most

SpaceX has the potential to build a business on an enormous scale, but potential is not the same as financial performance. Starlink demonstrates that the group can create a business with substantial revenue and high operating profitability. AI and the space segment, by contrast, remain ventures that require significant investment before their ability to generate sustainable, recurring revenue can be properly assessed.

That is why the most important issue will not be revenue growth alone, but whether SpaceX can translate expansion into a lasting improvement in profitability. If Starlink continues to increase its profits while AI and space operations begin to reduce their losses, the group’s scale could become its greatest competitive advantage. If, however, costs continue to rise as quickly as revenue, SpaceX will remain a company in which one profitable pillar finances an increasingly large portfolio of capital-intensive ambitions.

Source: XTB Reserach

20 October 2026, 4:38 pm

US OPEN: The wave of AI concerns is building again, oil returns near highs

20 October 2026, 1:44 pm

Netflix Preview. It needs to prove it can still surprise

20 October 2026, 9:32 am

Chart of the Day: US100 (Nasdaq 100). Rebound in AI trade vs. weakening technical picture

20 October 2026, 8:32 am

Macro Calendar - UK Labor Market, ZEW Sentiment, and Wall Street Giants' Reports

The content of this report has been created by XTB S.A., with its registered office in Warsaw, at Prosta 67, 00-838 Warsaw, Poland, (KRS number 0000217580) and supervised by Polish Supervision Authority ( No. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). This material is a marketing communication within the meaning of Art. 24 (3) of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). Marketing communication is not an investment recommendation or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958 of 9 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest or any other advice, including in the area of investment advisory, within the meaning of the Trading in Financial Instruments Act of 29 July 2005 (i.e. Journal of Laws 2019, item 875, as amended). The marketing communication is prepared with the highest diligence, objectivity, presents the facts known to the author on the date of preparation and is devoid of any evaluation elements. The marketing communication is prepared without considering the client’s needs, his individual financial situation and does not present any investment strategy in any way. The marketing communication does not constitute an offer of sale, offering, subscription, invitation to purchase, advertisement or promotion of any financial instruments. XTB S.A. is not liable for any client’s actions or omissions, in particular for the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments, undertaken on the basis of the information contained in this marketing communication. In the event that the marketing communication contains any information about any results regarding the financial instruments indicated therein, these do not constitute any guarantee or forecast regarding the future results.