Donald Trump is ramping up pressure on the Supreme Court ahead of a pivotal ruling that could invalidate his tariffs, warning that such an outcome would trigger “complete chaos” for the U.S. economy and public finances. There is a real possibility that a decision striking down the tariff regime would inject fresh volatility into markets, hit the U.S. dollar in particular, and weaken demand for U.S. government debt amid fears of broader, systemic instability in the world’s largest economy. For now, markets appear to be somewhat underpricing the legal risk, while the Trump administration signals it already has fallback options designed to keep its trade policy in place even in the event of an adverse ruling. This scenario may raise wider questions about institutional credibility in the United States and, more broadly, the resilience of the rules-based capitalist and legal system in the long term.
- The central risk revolves around refunds. Trump argues that if the tariffs are deemed unlawful, the government could be forced to roll them back and potentially repay enormous sums—an outcome he says would entail a multi-year, highly complex administrative and legal process.
- The tariffs face broad legal challenges from small businesses and a group of U.S. states, which claim the president exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping duties without congressional approval.
- The legal basis is the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which grants the president extraordinary powers in emergency situations; opponents counter that IEEPA does not even mention “tariffs,” and that under the Constitution, Congress holds the exclusive power to levy taxes.
- The financial stakes are substantial: tariffs imposed under IEEPA have generated more than $130 billion in revenue, meaning any cancellation or large-scale refunds would be both financially and politically fraught.
- Lower courts have already ruled against Trump on the question of authority, paving the way for a Supreme Court decision that investors and businesses are watching closely.
- Judges have signaled skepticism. During the November hearing, several conservative justices reportedly questioned the White House’s reasoning, including the notion that the trade deficit constitutes an “emergency.”
- The White House is also floating a Plan B. If the court rules against it, the administration is considering alternative legal pathways, including provisions that could allow tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days.
Which stocks could benefit?
As uncertainty builds, tariff-exposed companies—especially large importers—are hoping the duties are ruled unlawful, while the prospect of refunds, new regulations, or prolonged litigation could keep market volatility elevated (though not necessarily in equities). Which sectors and companies could stand to gain if the Supreme Court finds the tariffs illegal?
Retail could benefit, including:
-
Walmart (WMT): significant exposure to imports from China
-
Target (TGT): similar profile, high sensitivity to tariffs
-
Home Depot (HD) and Lowe’s (LOW): building materials, appliances, and home improvement goods
-
Costco (COST): large-scale import footprint
For these companies, tariffs are a direct cost that pressures margins and can only be partially passed on to consumers.
Apparel (low margins, Asia-based production)
-
Nike (NKE)
-
VF Corp (VFC)
-
Levi Strauss (LEVI)
-
Under Armour (UAA)
-
Gap (GPS)
For these firms, refunds would effectively mean a one-off cash inflow and improved cash flow dynamics.
Manufacturers and technology
Tariffs affected components as well as finished goods, lifting production costs. Refunds could improve financial results, reduce cost pressure, and support EBIT margins.
Potential names include:
-
Ford (F) and General Motors (GM)
-
Tesla (TSLA) (components, batteries, electronics)
-
Caterpillar (CAT)
-
Deere (DE)
-
Apple (AAPL)
-
HP (HPQ)
-
Cisco Systems (CSCO)
Source: xStation5
What to Expect from AMD’s Q4 Results: A Test of CPU, GPU, and AI
Polish stocks lead gains in Europe 📈W20 surges 2%
Economic Calendar: US Data Distorted by Government Shutdown
The Oracle paradox. Huge investments and the paradox of growing debt
The content of this report has been created by XTB S.A., with its registered office in Warsaw, at Prosta 67, 00-838 Warsaw, Poland, (KRS number 0000217580) and supervised by Polish Supervision Authority ( No. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). This material is a marketing communication within the meaning of Art. 24 (3) of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). Marketing communication is not an investment recommendation or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958 of 9 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest or any other advice, including in the area of investment advisory, within the meaning of the Trading in Financial Instruments Act of 29 July 2005 (i.e. Journal of Laws 2019, item 875, as amended). The marketing communication is prepared with the highest diligence, objectivity, presents the facts known to the author on the date of preparation and is devoid of any evaluation elements. The marketing communication is prepared without considering the client’s needs, his individual financial situation and does not present any investment strategy in any way. The marketing communication does not constitute an offer of sale, offering, subscription, invitation to purchase, advertisement or promotion of any financial instruments. XTB S.A. is not liable for any client’s actions or omissions, in particular for the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments, undertaken on the basis of the information contained in this marketing communication. In the event that the marketing communication contains any information about any results regarding the financial instruments indicated therein, these do not constitute any guarantee or forecast regarding the future results.