-
The US imposed comprehensive sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil, Russia's two largest oil companies. This marks a policy U-turn by Trump, aimed at forcing a ceasefire in Ukraine.
-
These sanctions, which include asset freezes and transaction bans (with a transition period until November 21, 2025), primarily aim to restrict oil exports to India and China, which account for the majority of Russian supply.
-
The market reaction was a 2% rise in WTI crude prices, but the underlying market still struggles with a significant oversupply (approx. 4 million bpd). Analysts suggest the sanctions could reduce the supply surplus next year.
-
The US imposed comprehensive sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil, Russia's two largest oil companies. This marks a policy U-turn by Trump, aimed at forcing a ceasefire in Ukraine.
-
These sanctions, which include asset freezes and transaction bans (with a transition period until November 21, 2025), primarily aim to restrict oil exports to India and China, which account for the majority of Russian supply.
-
The market reaction was a 2% rise in WTI crude prices, but the underlying market still struggles with a significant oversupply (approx. 4 million bpd). Analysts suggest the sanctions could reduce the supply surplus next year.
On October 22, the United States, specifically Donald Trump, decided to impose comprehensive sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil—Russia's two largest oil conglomerates. This marks the Trump administration's first significant action against the Russian energy sector since the President's return to the White House. This move is seen as a 180-degree shift from the US President's recent communication, where he had expressed satisfaction with talks with Putin and urged Ukraine to abandon the fight for certain territories. Now, the US aims to pressure Russia towards a ceasefire, with Ukrainian President Zelensky indicating a high probability of a ceasefire but without any declaration of yielding territory.
US Sanctions Imposed on Russian Companies:
-
Executive Order 14024 – sanctions imposed under the executive order concerning Russia's harmful activities.
-
Asset Freezing – all assets of both companies in the US or under the control of US persons have been blocked.
-
Transaction Ban – US citizens and companies are prohibited from conducting any financial transactions with the sanctioned conglomerates.
-
$50\%$ Rule – all entities controlled by at least $50\%$ by Rosneft or Lukoil are automatically subject to sanctions.
-
34 Subsidiaries – OFAC listed companies including Sibneftegaz, Bashneft-Dobicha, Lukoil-Perm, Lukoil-Kaliningradmorneft, RN-Yuganskneftegaz, and RITEK.
Threat of Secondary Sanctions:
-
Foreign banks conducting significant transactions with Rosneft or Lukoil may themselves become subject to secondary sanctions.
-
Non-US financial institutions processing transactions with the Russian companies lose access to the US financial system if they service sanctioned entities.
-
The goal is to limit oil imports from Russia by third countries—primarily China and India, which together imported approximately 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) from the two companies in the first half of 2025.
-
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned of further action and called for allied cooperation. The EU is imposing another sanctions package, indicating it will forgo Russian LNG gas from 2027.
-
Trump announced a conversation with President Xi Jinping regarding Russian oil purchases.
-
Transactions with Lukoil and Rosneft will be permitted until November 21, 2025.
-
This grace period is intended to allow companies to adjust to the new requirements.
Economic Consequences:
-
Oil prices have staged a strong rebound in recent days. This week's gain is over 5%.
-
Export Scale – Rosneft and Lukoil account for nearly half of Russian oil exports, approximately 3.1 million bpd.
-
Budget Revenue – the Russian oil and gas sector constitutes about 25% of the Russian federal budget revenue.
-
India – the largest buyer of Russian seaborne oil has initiated a contract review; state-owned refineries may be forced to withdraw from Russian supplies.
-
China – imports about 20% of its oil from Russia (approximately 2 million bpd), with refineries in Shandong province and CNPC particularly vulnerable.
India imports nearly 2 million bpd from Russia by sea. Representatives of Indian refineries indicate it will now be virtually impossible to purchase Russian oil. Source: Bloomberg Finance LP, XTB
Recently, we have observed a significant increase in the amount of oil at sea, which is disproportionate even to the high market oversupply. This may be the result of India withdrawing from purchasing Russian oil. Source: Bloomberg Finance LP, XTB
Geopolitical Context:
-
The sanctions were announced the day after the cancellation of the Trump-Putin meeting in Hungary.
-
Trump stated he had "waited a long time" and did not want a "wasted meeting" without progress in peace talks.
-
The EU simultaneously adopted its 19th sanctions package, including a ban on Russian LNG imports from 2027 and restrictions on 117 vessels from the shadow fleet.
Oil Market Fundamentals:
-
The current market oversupply is nearly 4 million bpd. The surplus has been growing since the start of this year. The current situation resembles the late $1990$s or the $2014-2016$ period, which also saw a massive market surplus. Price declines were significantly steeper during those periods than they are now, though the current oversupply has been present, with few interruptions, since $2022$.
-
The IEA expects the oversupply to persist at around 4 million bpd next year, but the current situation may change that picture. India and potentially China are not easily replaced as oil export destinations. Previously, these two large countries replaced the entire European Union as the main recipient. This potentially threatens to reduce the available supply on the market by 2-4 million bpd, although smaller countries will certainly be found that may buy Russian oil in smaller quantities, using older, uninsured fleets. The downward trend in the oil market should continue, but the oversupply next year may certainly be smaller than the IEA anticipates.
The current oversupply situation is reminiscent of the late $1990$s or the $2014-2016$ period. While the surplus may decrease due to sanctions on Russia, it will most likely still be present, which could place pressure on prices. Source: Bloomberg Finance LP
Technical Situation:
The price is up over 2% today, testing the 25-period moving average. The upward momentum could lead to a rise towards $62 per barrel, where the 50-period moving average is located. However, it should not exceed the zone around $63-$65 per barrel, which contains the downtrend line and the range of previous consolidation from August and September. If, however, the current sanctions prove to be a "paper tiger" (possible further assurances from Putin and cancellation of sanctions, or continued broad Russian exports), the price may once again drop to the vicinity of $57 and permanently settle below $55 per barrel next year.

BREAKING: OIL gain extends to 3.5% 📈Chinese state companies stop Russian oil purchases
BREAKING: Canadian core retail sales well below expectations🚩USDCAD reacts
Highlights From The S&P 500 Earnings Season 🗽What's up on Wall Street?
IBM earnings: Slow growth and poor guidance
The content of this report has been created by XTB S.A., with its registered office in Warsaw, at Prosta 67, 00-838 Warsaw, Poland, (KRS number 0000217580) and supervised by Polish Supervision Authority ( No. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). This material is a marketing communication within the meaning of Art. 24 (3) of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). Marketing communication is not an investment recommendation or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958 of 9 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest or any other advice, including in the area of investment advisory, within the meaning of the Trading in Financial Instruments Act of 29 July 2005 (i.e. Journal of Laws 2019, item 875, as amended). The marketing communication is prepared with the highest diligence, objectivity, presents the facts known to the author on the date of preparation and is devoid of any evaluation elements. The marketing communication is prepared without considering the client’s needs, his individual financial situation and does not present any investment strategy in any way. The marketing communication does not constitute an offer of sale, offering, subscription, invitation to purchase, advertisement or promotion of any financial instruments. XTB S.A. is not liable for any client’s actions or omissions, in particular for the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments, undertaken on the basis of the information contained in this marketing communication. In the event that the marketing communication contains any information about any results regarding the financial instruments indicated therein, these do not constitute any guarantee or forecast regarding the future results.