Read more
7:30 pm · 13 May 2026

Trump–Xi: Who represents business and how are markets reacting?

One of the most important geopolitical and economic meetings of the year began today in Beijing. The diplomatic summit is expected to include direct negotiations between the leaders of the United States and China, as well as talks between representatives of American business and the Chinese Communist Party.

The market expects the main topics to be the economy and technology. This is particularly important amid the ongoing “AI boom” and the spectacular rally in semiconductor stocks. Donald Trump partly confirms these expectations through the composition of the delegation alone—it is packed with representatives and CEOs of the most important and largest technology and financial companies in the United States.

Delegation lineup:

  • Technology:
    • Elon Musk — Tesla
    • Tim Cook — Apple
    • Jensen Huang — Nvidia
    • Cristiano Amon — Qualcomm
    • Sanjay Mehrotra — Micron
    • Chuck Robbins — Cisco
    • Dina Powell McCormick — Meta
    • Jim Anderson — Coherent
    • Jacob Thaysen — Illumina
  • Finance:
    • Larry Fink — BlackRock
    • Stephen Schwarzman — Blackstone
    • Jane Fraser — Citi
    • David Solomon — Goldman Sachs
    • Michael Miebach — Mastercard
    • Ryan McInerney — Visa
  • Industry:
    • Kelly Ortberg — Boeing
    • H. Lawrence Culp — GE
    • Brian Sikes — Cargill

The market clearly favors companies whose representatives are at the negotiating table. This is especially visible in the case of the lesser-known firms in the group.
Coherent is up more than 7%. Nvidia and Tesla are also gaining more than 2%.

From the delegation’s composition, you can read more than just the names of CEOs. Interstate interactions at this level, especially when China is involved - are as much theater as they are business.
The presence or absence of major players signals the degree of closeness and alignment between a company’s leadership and the U.S. administration. It may also indicate where specific entities fit into current and future economic policy—or that they do not. This can matter even more for smaller companies.

Also notable is Meta’s decision to send Dina Powell. Meta’s interests in China are limited due to the extreme level of censorship. This may also be a signal from Meta or the U.S. government following China’s recent move to block the acquisition of one of the Chinese AI firms. Dina Powell is primarily a specialist in political advisory and financing - not technology.

This is only the beginning of the negotiations. Beyond the formal outcomes, attentive investors should closely track the indirect signals and gestures of the participants.

13 May 2026, 8:46 pm

Daily Summary: Hot inflation and awaiting for news from Beijing

11 May 2026, 9:02 pm

Daily summary: Semiconductors divert attention from Iran

11 May 2026, 7:35 pm

China, Saudi Aramco and Oil - What's Next?

8 May 2026, 1:59 pm

📈 EURUSD up 0.4% before the NFP

The content of this report has been created by XTB S.A., with its registered office in Warsaw, at Prosta 67, 00-838 Warsaw, Poland, (KRS number 0000217580) and supervised by Polish Supervision Authority ( No. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). This material is a marketing communication within the meaning of Art. 24 (3) of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). Marketing communication is not an investment recommendation or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958 of 9 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest or any other advice, including in the area of investment advisory, within the meaning of the Trading in Financial Instruments Act of 29 July 2005 (i.e. Journal of Laws 2019, item 875, as amended). The marketing communication is prepared with the highest diligence, objectivity, presents the facts known to the author on the date of preparation and is devoid of any evaluation elements. The marketing communication is prepared without considering the client’s needs, his individual financial situation and does not present any investment strategy in any way. The marketing communication does not constitute an offer of sale, offering, subscription, invitation to purchase, advertisement or promotion of any financial instruments. XTB S.A. is not liable for any client’s actions or omissions, in particular for the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments, undertaken on the basis of the information contained in this marketing communication. In the event that the marketing communication contains any information about any results regarding the financial instruments indicated therein, these do not constitute any guarantee or forecast regarding the future results.