Read more
5:16 pm · 23 February 2026

EU Suspends Landmark Trade Deal. Gold is up 2%

-
-
Open account Download free app

The European Parliament on Monday froze the ratification process of the hard-won EU-US trade agreement, known as the "Turnberry Agreement," signaling a dramatic breakdown in transatlantic relations.

The decision follows a weekend of legal and political upheaval in Washington. A landmark US Supreme Court ruling on February 20 declared President Donald Trump’s previous tariffs—imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—unconstitutional. The President responded almost immediately by invoking a separate, rarely used legal provision to impose a new 15% global levy.

 

The SCOTUS Ruling: A Constitutional Rebuke

On Friday, February 20, the US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump exceeded his executive authority. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, clarified that the IEEPA does not grant the President the power to unilaterally impose tariffs, as the "taxing power" is a constitutional prerogative reserved strictly for Congress.

The ruling effectively nullified tariffs that have generated between $130bn and $180bn in customs revenue to date, and which were projected to bring in $1.4tn over the next decade.

 

Trump’s Counterstrike: Section 122

Within hours of the judicial defeat, Mr. Trump signed an executive order imposing a new 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974—a provision previously dormant for such purposes. By Saturday, February 21, the President announced via Truth Social that the rate would be hiked to 15%, the maximum allowed under that statute.

The new measures are set to take effect on February 24 and can remain in force for 150 days (until approximately July 23, 2026) without Congressional approval. In a series of combative posts, Mr. Trump:

  • Characterized the dissenting justices as "fools" and a "disgrace to their families."

  • Warned today: "Any nation that wants to play games with the Supreme Court decision will be met with a much higher tariff, and worse."

  • Insisted: "I do not have to go back to Congress to get approval of tariffs," signaling his intent to bypass legislative oversight.

  • Promised to unveil further "legally permissible" tariff structures in the coming months.

 

Brussels Retaliates: "A Deal is a Deal"

This marks the second time the ratification of the July 2025 Turnberry Agreement has been halted. The process was briefly frozen in January 2026 following Mr. Trump’s threats regarding the acquisition of Greenland.

Bernd Lange, Chairman of the European Parliament’s Trade Committee, convened an emergency meeting on Monday to propose the indefinite suspension of legislative work. "Does the move to Section 122 not constitute a breach of our agreement?" Mr. Lange asked, pointing to a potential legal overlap.

The primary concern for Brussels is that the new 15% global tariff may be applied in addition to existing Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) rates. This could push the effective tax on EU exports well beyond the agreed 15% ceiling. Zeljana Zovko, a negotiator for the EPP, stated that the Parliament had "no choice" but to wait for total legal clarity.

The European Commission issued a stern communique, emphasizing that "a deal is a deal" and warning that unpredictable tariffs are "inherently destructive" to market stability.

 

The Tariff Arithmetic: A Growing Burden

The critical question for markets is whether the 15% Section 122 levy replaces or supplements the Turnberry rates. US Trade Representative Greer has suggested the new tariff is "distinct" from existing agreements.

Under this "supplemental" scenario, effective rates on European goods could theoretically surge to 30%. According to the Yale Budget Lab, a full application of Section 122 without exemptions could drive the average US effective tariff rate to 24.1%—higher even than the 16.9% seen during the height of the IEEPA era.

 

Market Reaction: Gold Surges

Financial markets reacted swiftly to the escalating trade war. Gold prices surged nearly 2%, approaching $5,200 per ounce, as investors sought safety amid the transatlantic rift. Curiously, the EURUSD pair and European equity indices remained relatively stable, suggesting that markets may still be struggling to price in the full complexity of the "tariff-upon-tariff" scenario.

The coming weeks will be decisive. While the US House of Representatives recently passed a resolution rejecting tariffs on Canada—indicating growing domestic opposition—Mr. Trump appears undeterred. For European exporters, the risk of a doubled tariff burden remains the primary threat to the 2026 economic outlook.

23 February 2026, 1:08 pm

⛔ Trump’s tariffs ruled illegal: will companies receive billions of dollars in refunds?

17 February 2026, 5:44 pm

Oil drops over 2% on possible Iran Deal 🛢️🔥

6 February 2026, 4:51 pm

Geopolitical Briefing (06.02.2026): Is Iran Still a Risk Factor?

4 February 2026, 6:10 pm

India: New battleground of the trade war?

The content of this report has been created by XTB S.A., with its registered office in Warsaw, at Prosta 67, 00-838 Warsaw, Poland, (KRS number 0000217580) and supervised by Polish Supervision Authority ( No. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). This material is a marketing communication within the meaning of Art. 24 (3) of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). Marketing communication is not an investment recommendation or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958 of 9 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest or any other advice, including in the area of investment advisory, within the meaning of the Trading in Financial Instruments Act of 29 July 2005 (i.e. Journal of Laws 2019, item 875, as amended). The marketing communication is prepared with the highest diligence, objectivity, presents the facts known to the author on the date of preparation and is devoid of any evaluation elements. The marketing communication is prepared without considering the client’s needs, his individual financial situation and does not present any investment strategy in any way. The marketing communication does not constitute an offer of sale, offering, subscription, invitation to purchase, advertisement or promotion of any financial instruments. XTB S.A. is not liable for any client’s actions or omissions, in particular for the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments, undertaken on the basis of the information contained in this marketing communication. In the event that the marketing communication contains any information about any results regarding the financial instruments indicated therein, these do not constitute any guarantee or forecast regarding the future results.

Join over 2 000 000 XTB Group Clients from around the world.