6:36 pm · 25 June 2026

Micron earnings: Is perfection not enough anymore?

The memory manufacturer released its long-awaited results and, despite high expectations, managed to beat them very clearly. The stock is up more than 10% in the post-earnings session.

Financial data

  • The pace and scale of growth have taken analysts’ and investors’ breath away.
  • The company raised its quarterly revenue from USD 25 billion to over USD 41 billion, which represents 170% growth - quarter-on-quarter, not year-on-year.
  • EPS increased from USD 12 to over USD 25, which is a 200% rise.
  • Gross margin remains above 80% in nearly all segments of the company; only the automotive segment posts 79%.
  • Growth across all business segments is around 100%, with the fastest growth in the data center segment, followed by memory.
  • After investments of USD 7.1 billion, free cash flow stands at USD 18.3 billion.

Guidance

  • The company announced an even better Q3, with guidance above expectations.
  • Projected revenue next quarter is expected to rise to USD 50 billion, with margins around 86% and EPS of USD 31.

Market reaction

  • Contrary to what many investors expected, Micron’s strong results turned out to be pressure on the tech sector - not support.
 

Souce: Bloomberg Finance

  • Micron’s huge profits and optimistic forecasts mean capital expenditure remains stable, but they also imply an increasingly heavy burden on the budgets of companies that already have to take on record amounts of debt.

MU.US (D1)

 

The company’s uptrend is very sharp and steep, but Fibonacci levels help identify potential resistance and support zones. If, for some reason, supply were to take the инициативive, strong resistance would most likely be the (also psychological) level of USD 1000. For buyers, the next target is a wide resistance zone around USD 1300.

Not everything that glitters is gold

While the pace and scale of the company’s growth are unmatched and phenomenal, no company is free of risk and weaknesses - and that is also the case for Micron (and other memory companies).

At present, the company is benefiting from unprecedented investments by the tech sector in data centers. Revenue growth is enormous, but it is driven by a sudden and concentrated jump in demand, not by innovation on the companies’ side.

Companies involved in the specialized, previously niche business of producing DRAM and NAND memory are cyclical - not without reason. In cycles of strong economic conditions and periods of (smaller or larger) speculative bubbles in the tech sector, demand for memory rises drastically and rapidly. The current increases mean that: we are observing another period of costly and wide-ranging investments — which may not pay off - on a scale greater than ever before… or a paradigm shift is taking place, and AI-driven demand is the new “base” and starting point for the company’s revenues. Both scenarios are difficult and risky to value.

Valuation difficulty is compounded by the fact that memory producers do not differ much in their offerings - creating a dangerous combination of concentrated demand and fairly strong competition, even though the production process itself is quite specialized.
In the past, this has repeatedly led to the formation of cartels and price-fixing among RAM manufacturers. The U.S. Department of Justice proved anti-consumer behavior and price collusion by RAM producers during the Dot-com bubble (1998–2002); Micron was one of them.

 

Such behavior in the current market would be extremely risky, not because of legal or regulatory consequences, but because the CAPEX budgets required to purchase memory alone are already hard to imagine. SemiAnalysis and CLSA estimate that out of the hundreds of billions in CAPEX by tech companies, currently about 30–40% is spending on memory alone — and that share is expected to grow.

Companies like Micron are fully dependent on that spending, and if they themselves start standing in the way of the “AI revolution,” they could stop it - and lose their position as quickly as they gained it.

Outlook going forward

A “wild card” for the sector in the coming quarters is China. Chinese memory manufacturers, thanks to deep integration with a centrally planned economy and direct access to financial support, can very quickly “dump” enough memory on the market to push sector margins down - even if revenues continue to grow.

Regardless of whether valuations and profits of memory companies, including Micron, are “rational,” the fact is that the gigantic investment budgets of hyperscale companies are not going anywhere in the near term, and that, in a simple mechanical way, means these companies should continue to wow the market with great results.

Is there a chance that these companies will break out of the cyclical nature of their business? Partly. Even if the AI industry eventually disappoints investors and some investments become worthless, one should not expect hundreds of massive data centers to disappear overnight. They will require maintenance and modernization.

Kamil Szczepański

Financial Markets Analyst, XTB

25 June 2026, 7:45 pm

Apple Price Hikes: Memory costs weigh on the company’s and markets

25 June 2026, 5:01 pm

US OPEN: Micron is not enough, Wall Street deepens declines

24 June 2026, 8:33 pm

Daily Summary- Wall Street Holds Firm While Commodities Plunge on Hawkish Fed

24 June 2026, 5:06 pm

US OPEN: Indices rebound in anticipation of Micron's results

The content of this report has been created by XTB S.A., with its registered office in Warsaw, at Prosta 67, 00-838 Warsaw, Poland, (KRS number 0000217580) and supervised by Polish Supervision Authority ( No. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). This material is a marketing communication within the meaning of Art. 24 (3) of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). Marketing communication is not an investment recommendation or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958 of 9 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest or any other advice, including in the area of investment advisory, within the meaning of the Trading in Financial Instruments Act of 29 July 2005 (i.e. Journal of Laws 2019, item 875, as amended). The marketing communication is prepared with the highest diligence, objectivity, presents the facts known to the author on the date of preparation and is devoid of any evaluation elements. The marketing communication is prepared without considering the client’s needs, his individual financial situation and does not present any investment strategy in any way. The marketing communication does not constitute an offer of sale, offering, subscription, invitation to purchase, advertisement or promotion of any financial instruments. XTB S.A. is not liable for any client’s actions or omissions, in particular for the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments, undertaken on the basis of the information contained in this marketing communication. In the event that the marketing communication contains any information about any results regarding the financial instruments indicated therein, these do not constitute any guarantee or forecast regarding the future results.