The largest DRAM memory manufacturers have come under legal pressure in the United States. Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology have been sued in a federal court in California by a group of consumers and small businesses alleging price-fixing and artificial supression of memory supply. The case could become one of the more important tests for the market at a time of extreme valuations and shortages.
According to the lawsuit, the manufacturers allegedly coordinated restrictions on the supply of traditional DRAM modules, including DDR3 and DDR4, while at the same time redirecting a larger share of production capacity toward HBM. The plaintiffs claim these actions led to market shortages and a sharp rise in memory component prices.
Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron control the vast majority of the global DRAM supply. This means that any coordinated production cuts would have a much greater impact on the market than similar actions in less specialized industries.
In recent weeks, makers of electronics, consoles, and computer hardware have increasingly pointed to higher component costs as a reason for price increases. For consumers, the problem is therefore not limited to the PC parts market, but also affects computers, consoles, smartphones, and other devices that use DRAM.
At this stage, however, these are still only allegations. The case will require proving that the observed supply constraints were not solely the result of a rational response by manufacturers to the AI boom, but stemmed from coordinated conduct that restricted competition.
Potentially most significant is the fact that RAM makers, including Samsung and SK Hynix, which are named now, were once already found guilty of exactly this kind of behavior in the 1998–2002 period. On the other hand, a nearly identical lawsuit reached court in 2018, in which Samsung, Hynix, and Micron were again accused of price-fixing, but the court then deemed the evidence insufficient.
At the same time, Samsung and SK Hynix are announcing massive investment plans in South Korea, putting considerable pressure on valuations of companies in the sector, which are currently supported by expectations of prolonged shortages.
As part of a government program to expand the semiconductor ecosystem, both companies are to build new fabs, with the total scale of the project counted in the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Any margin pressure from additional supply, if it materializes, will be significantly delayed, however, because building and bringing advanced manufacturing capacity online takes years.
MU.US (D1)
The company’s uptrend is very strong and steep, but the FIBO level helps identify potential resistance and support zones. If, for some reason, supply were to take the initiative, strong resistance would most likely be the (also psychological) $1,000 level. For buyers, the next target is a broad resistance zone around $1,300. Source: xStation5
Daily summary: Semiconductors are swallowing Wall Street
IBM shows a breakthrough: Leader of the next revolution?
Apple Price Hikes: Memory costs weigh on the company’s and markets
Micron earnings: Is perfection not enough anymore?
The content of this report has been created by XTB S.A., with its registered office in Warsaw, at Prosta 67, 00-838 Warsaw, Poland, (KRS number 0000217580) and supervised by Polish Supervision Authority ( No. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). This material is a marketing communication within the meaning of Art. 24 (3) of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (MiFID II). Marketing communication is not an investment recommendation or information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/958 of 9 March 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest or any other advice, including in the area of investment advisory, within the meaning of the Trading in Financial Instruments Act of 29 July 2005 (i.e. Journal of Laws 2019, item 875, as amended). The marketing communication is prepared with the highest diligence, objectivity, presents the facts known to the author on the date of preparation and is devoid of any evaluation elements. The marketing communication is prepared without considering the client’s needs, his individual financial situation and does not present any investment strategy in any way. The marketing communication does not constitute an offer of sale, offering, subscription, invitation to purchase, advertisement or promotion of any financial instruments. XTB S.A. is not liable for any client’s actions or omissions, in particular for the acquisition or disposal of financial instruments, undertaken on the basis of the information contained in this marketing communication. In the event that the marketing communication contains any information about any results regarding the financial instruments indicated therein, these do not constitute any guarantee or forecast regarding the future results.